2009年12月13日星期日

剖析非主流―汉语网络文化和网络传播 :)


Subject:
剖析非主流汉语网络文化和网络传播 :)

内容提高:

         非主流定义和历史沿革

         关于网络家族

         Visual kei、哥特次文化和青少年次文化

         脑残族和语言体系

         关于哥和寂寞的传说

         悖论:非主流文化向主流文化(先进文化?)的转变

什么是非主流?请不要百度,如果你真的不幸进到了百度百科非主流词条,记住一件事,点开历史版本,然后仔细观摩激烈的斗争历史。那是商家营销它的非主流品牌的斗争,那是炒作商操纵小白僵尸的阵地,那是某网络家族吸引会员的首选,那是恶搞讽刺的绝佳位置。

本文从反非主流 的角度来阐述非主流,为你全面理清易混淆的概念,展示非主流备受诋毁的特点。由于文章很长,列几个问题,带着问题读更快:非主流跟视觉系什么关系?两者特点?EMO是?反非反什么?


.非主流定义

这里的非主流不是指简单语义上主流的对立面,是指一种亚文化,是特定时期某些80-90后的穿着,喜好,行为方式等。

网路上我们认定谁属于非主流,一般依据什么?外形特征是吧!瞧一眼照片,瞬间雷到,那么你可能就认为此人非主流。而此人属不属于非主流,并不是你一人说的算,于是传播,围观,求鉴定应运而生,最后众口一致,狂喷不已,那他就算是非主流了。

注意一个问题,当非主流刚出现时,如引不来关注,也没有人围观争议,那么说明多数人已经接受认可,也即纳入主流。哪天我们不在争论非主流了,要么是非主流已纳入主流,要么是非主流已死。

由于非主流自身不会认为自己是非主流,所以我认为非主流最确切的概念由反非主流来定义更为精准,争论的焦点即为非主流,唾骂最尖锐的观点即为非主流最显著差异于主流的特征,争议最火爆的时候即为最辉煌的时候。

.非主流时间线

20053Qzone推出,于此同时《劲舞团》大陆开服内测,这两件事,成了后来非主流的主要应用和阵地。上图曲线就很明确的展示了两条曲线的吻合度。

其中QQ空间的推出,决定着非主流的走向。籍着qq庞大的用户群,qq空间迅速风靡网路,年轻态的SNS得以推广,在青少年中备受欢迎。追求酷炫,个性的空间也是由年轻人带起,各种代码站,PS图,非主流文字,空间模板,互踩联盟,刷人气挂等应运而生。

追求个性酷炫不单是90后的专享,对比当时大学生实名注册的校内网,就不难发现,那里一样花哨,一样追求酷炫。甚至很少国人玩的Myspace也是如此。SNS的特点就是要人展示个性,拉圈占地。非主流的发展,也正是在此运动中,迎合众多年轻人的一股潮流。

各种非主流的网络家族,从社交上满足你人气需求,从视觉上满足你个性酷炫需求,从心理上满足你结群认可需求,这些都是促使非主流迅速风靡的内因。至于非主流本身代表什么?年轻人才懒得追问,不满足操蛋的学校,难道网路上都不能获取认同,是不是?

后来网路非主流的现象,由于某些人群古怪的造型,才引起了人们广泛讨论批判,并把此现象带到90后身上,这至少是有一定代表性的。

再回顾上图曲线高峰,2008年,80后与90后展开了一场非主流争论。起因是一系列的视频,如现实的事件:Youku视频《因为非主流而被打 》。还有网友制作的视频:《蠢爸爸反非主流新闻联播》,《80后小资MM笑谈你全家都是非主流》(注:最初原视频已删)。而后在回击:《非主流新社会精英反击80后裹布女》当中掀起。【详细请参:非主流新文化运动始末。】

7月,由于《劲舞团》突然宣布提倡主流文化和主旋律”,反对非主流火星文。致使搜索达到最高峰。

无论2008年的争论如何,打击面都是巨大的,把非主流扩展到大多数的90后,此类视频还引发了一连串的模仿暴打非主流文体,还有一些恶搞歌曲:反非主流之歌,无数的PS照片。

2009年,一向以猥琐著称的MOP,抛出了众多幽默讽刺的著名反非事件,使非主流人群一如既往的耀眼夺目。请往下看,标题八,九,十的反非事件。

反非阵营是巨大的,各种反非主流吧 (Q)反非联盟 处处皆是,网络暴力经常发生,如组队爆非主流qq空间等。非主流争议仍将持续中。

.网络家族

要理解非主流,不能不谈网络家族。玩过网游的人对家族都不会陌生。大多数的网游,你要是没加入个家族,帮会,工会之类,简直是没法混下去的,拉帮结派,分享资源,划分势力都是家族才有能力完成,群劈,洗城,霸服经常发生,你不得不投靠个帮会,有帮会罩着,才好游戏。

家族跟懒散的组队有什么区别呢?顾名思义,家族自然有族长,族规,分辈份,统一的姓。网络家族也是按此操作。与那些以兴趣汇集成的网络圈子有点不同,非主流网络家族在组织上是十分严密的,发展起来有点像《浪潮》描述那样,迅速,貌似个性,其实相当去个性化,统一是必须的,而后发展成偶像崇拜。

非主流很在乎榜单,像qq空间排名,360圈型男女榜51空间等。所以非主流家族主要影响占据着,年轻态的SNS,论坛贴吧,门户,fans阵地。

非主流家族一般以视觉,空间代码,游戏联盟,PS等为招牌,吸收成员,通过Q群等组织扩张交流。

通过搜索引擎,你会经常发现各类网络家族排行榜,如下表:

名次(仅供参考)

网络家族名称

谷歌搜到的条目数

1

杀马特

9,640,000

2

Smile家族

1,500,000

3

残血家族

299,000

4

H.B.集团

459,000

5

清诱家族

11,500,000

6

邪势力の家族

394,000

7

���/.家族

6,450

8

_瞳祭�家族

6,490

9

M.冥�ㄨ家族

3,740

10

韩流界家族

372,000

以排名考前的杀马特和残血为例,我们再来认识下家族的特点。有时候我都怀疑创始杀马特的人比传销的都牛逼!它们有组织,有纪律!能迅速抢占所有小白据点。

首先是初期宣传,拉人,造神:

视觉为先,阵营统一,吸引注意。创始人,一定要大力宣传,包括族长级人物也要选好。树立风格,抢占排行榜。

入会:

比如残血的吸引入会手段:

注册成功后,然后你就可以免费拿取本家族社区(因为本社区所有模块地址都是要注册会员才可以拿到的) 所有模块的地址啦~,让你的空间漂亮起来~

组织管理审查

下图为杀马特的规章

成员人数:

非主流家族人数众多,例子可参残血的网站,几百个Q群:残血家族群网 残血QQ空间社区

我还到杀马特的QQ风云榜截了张图,人数雷惨了,数字虚的吧:

收入:

杀马特家族官网了解到 ,可花钱买推荐,靠拉票拉流量,广告等获利。现在搞红一个家族的,多是网吧或公司所为,靠此带动品牌,拉流量,赚人气,然后再想尽办法从中获利。也许里面还有更大的收益产业,要不网络家族怎会如此繁荣,怎会有人不断去做。

像这些网络家族,内部搞蛊出什么流派,某某魔系,高层出走自创门派的,太狗血不细查了,看得乏味无意义。我也没给杀马特配图,珍惜眼睛。总之家族是庞大的,有组织的,讨论非主流时不容忽视的。

.模仿Visual kei

Visual kei(视觉系)这词来源于日本视觉系摇滚祖师爷X Japan口号:“Psychedelic Violence: Crime of Visual Shock”(迷幻狂乱:视觉震击之罪)里的Visual Shock

由于视觉系装扮对乐迷很有吸引力,许多女生都会在演唱会模仿她们喜欢乐队的装扮,因此视觉系随着视觉摇滚乐队在日本得到发展。

非主流们宣称他们是模仿的视觉系,玩的是视觉系,其实他们不了解。有的还把VR也当做视觉系,VR是指visual rock(视觉摇滚),而众多的非主流根本就不是摇滚乐迷,甚至都不玩音乐。

再看日本视觉系的一些特点:

1.画黑眼线,假睫毛

2.把头发染成不同颜色

3.混合朋克和哥特着装

4.多套几个环

非主流从中模仿到了一些特点,但丧失了美得感受,也没有自己的文化。用句话讲,不是哪张杯罩都适合你,得看你有没有那个size。这就是生搬硬套的绝佳例子。

在日本,绝大部分视觉系乐队都是男性,加之发展出的装扮越来越女性化,妖艳化,所以也受到众多的贬损。视觉系经常遭人们混淆,像cosplay是不 能称为视觉系的,模仿ACG里的人物才能称上cosplay。而各punkgothlolita的造型也不属于visual kei,那么你会问如何区别呢?

你只要记住以上的视觉系特点,加上最重要一条去性别化,显双性化就可以了。非主流就是学到了这点,学活了这点。例子参下图:

看到视觉系去性别化的装扮了吗?有男人味吗?没看出来?我靠,瞟到最右边着吊带袜的小受,身都酥了。

如果你还是不明白,我再赐张图,你能分清VR的男女吗?

这就是双性化特征,非主流模仿到了

.跟哥德次文化关系?

哥德次文化Gothic 又译哥特)是什么?既然是次文化,当然由哥德文化衍生出来,那些模仿传统歌德形式的各类型次文化,都能称之为歌德次文化。像哥特建筑,哥特字体,哥特文学 等,这些都是早期塑造哥特风格的形式,如此庞大根本无法介绍,所以谈次文化,只能从视觉入手,那是给人的第一印象,也是印象最深刻的地方。艺术家Megan Balanck将哥德按视觉效果的类型分为二十一种

(1-7)

(8-14)

(15-21)

传统歌特

自信活泼歌特

金属党歌特

浪漫主义歌特

消沉歌特

吸血鬼哥特

赛博歌特

死亡摇滚歌特

EMO哥特

恋物歌特

蝙蝠宝宝歌特

怪胎哥特

嬉皮歌特

上班族歌特

Gothabilly

日本歌特

维多利亚歌特

夜总会哥特

铆钉头/工业歌特

中世纪歌特

蒸汽朋克哥特

显然,划分这么多类型是哥特fans才会做的,而任何汲取了哥特艺术养分的类型,都能将它们涵盖一起。那如何确切区分谁属于哥特次文化?哥特的流派细分,并没有掩盖它们的共同特征,我们就靠识别共同特征了解哥特,区分哥特。

视觉特征:吸血鬼,红黑,深色系,黑眼影,死亡气息,恐怖,怪诞,很少打钉,银饰

典型装扮特征如下图:

这里有一点必须强调,虽然哥特看起来黑暗,但哥特精神是非暴力的,也没有自残一说。非主流们常常混淆,拿自残,血等充当哥特,认为吸血鬼见血兴奋乃想到自残,这是十分愚蠢和伤害自身的事情。吸血鬼文化影响根本无自残,它真正发展出来的次文化是SM。如下图:

演变是越来越性感的装束和sm文化,自残的请不要站到此队列,包括受非主流追捧的ck沉珂。哥特无自残文化。

还有一个经常被人混淆的是哥特洛丽塔,它是由传统的歌德现代版发展到日本结合Lolita的版本,视觉上就是以红黑为主的蕾丝膝裙。

现在你能很好区分哥特和视觉系了吧!两个都打扮成黑色系时,那个不男不女的定是视觉系。

综上,有可能哥特造型在一定程度上影响了非主流,但非主流并非属于哥特。因为从流传的影响上看,是哥特首先影响了华丽摇滚,然后才产生视觉系摇滚,最后才有视觉系。非主流跟哥特毫无瓜葛。

.普遍的青少年次文化现象

你会问上面提到的跟非主流有屁关系,对,嘛关系都没有,绝大多数人是看到别人玩,朋友玩,自己也跟着玩,而不至于落队,显得out了。这其实才是普遍的青少年次文化得以发展的根源。非主流也是青少年次文化现象中的一员,虽然以山寨成分为主。

到处都有这些青少年次文化现象,以下就是两个实例:

1.MK

pic via

MK是指旺角(Mong Kok),而“MK并不是特指旺角的人。由于旺角是香港的潮流地,那些盲目追随潮流,又不得其意,整得不伦不类的人,称其为MK人,是贬义。

MK人的着装叫MK look,作为一个名词,指一群14-25岁的青少年,有独特的衣著文化,并在香港有一定的影响范围。

香港网络大典这么形容mk人的特征:

1.经常穿著过小的奇怪服饰

2.身裁瘦弱却扮大支

3.纹身

4.吸烟

5.性格暴躁

6.自创潮语、缩写

7.愤世嫉俗的价值观

MK主义

哪代的非潮流青少年不是面对着汹涌的口水成长起来,MK人的贬义其实就是反MK者贴上的标签,身为MK人肯定不自知,争论随之而来。

wiki上这么说:

香港的主流价值观不太接受MK主义,而反MK主义就是另一个极端。反MK主义者会认为 MK人完全不能接受,MK人任何的举手投足均被反MK主义者视为厌恶性之行为。尤甚者甚至以符号学作为判断MK人与非MK人之严格介定,如部份反MK主义 者声称染发为不能接受之MK行为,或将任何穿耳环之男士均视为MK等。追根究柢MK文化与反MK主义均为社会新旧价值观不协调所产生的价值观冲突,社会人 士应多加注意以作多方面协调。

更有部份人带贬抑性质地以MK人统称他们,指责他们贪慕虚荣或只爱盲目追逐潮流,并且归类他们为无所事事的不良少年,言行与品味低俗。

2.Emo Kid

emo不是指emotional(情绪化)的缩写,它是一种亚文化,以青少年为主体,假 装个性,时刻感到孤独,空虚,伤感,一般不笑,玩的音乐就像雌性激素的punk,歌词抒情泛滥,他们寻找自己缺陷的人生,然后创造一种沉闷,荒谬,只有他 们这群体才能了解的世界或音乐。为了加深印象,观摩墨西哥的EMO视频

当一种亚文化流行时,多数青少年仅仅是跟风而已,以致后来发展出的特点替代了最初,主流 跟非主流会十分含糊。所以,有些时候,别人说emo是一种音乐,不抵制,只反对”emo kid”,为了不混淆,一般都说的emoemo kid,因现今emo的主体多是青少年,整个亚文化也是由此形成。

emo的浓缩概念造型如上图,MySpace是他们的阵地,就像qq空间是非主流的主要阵地一样。emo与非主流现象有许多的类似。

下表为美国不同年代类似EMO KIDS的潮流。

年代

EMO KIDS WERE

DRUG OF CHOICE(麻痹的选择,迷药)

1920’s

Flappers(新潮女郎)

shit,死动物,汗,收帆水手

1930’s

Everyone(每个人)

烈酒,咳嗽药,可卡因

1940’s

Nazis(纳粹)

spanspanspanspan

Posted via email from LIBLOG INSTANT BLOG

2009年5月10日星期日

史上最心酸的普利策奖

普利策Feature Photograph 奖Damon Winter作品当Paul Giblin得知他获得今年的普利策奖时,他却无法高兴。因为,在几个月前,他已经被东谷论坛报裁掉了。吊诡的是,昨天,他为这份报纸获得了普利策最佳本地报道奖,普利策奖最重要的奖项之一。 "It is kind of sad," he said. "I wish I was still at the Tribune. I'd have a party with them right now." 我想他的东家此刻也会用拖鞋使劲拍打脑袋,为这个无奈但愚蠢的决定后悔:“曾经有一个优秀的记者摆在我面前,我没有珍惜,等到他获得了普利策奖才后悔莫及。人生最悲哀的事情莫过于此。如果上天能再给我一次重来的机会,我会对那个记者说三个字:留下来。如果要在这段工作合同前加个期限,我希望是一万年!” 但一些都显得太迟了。愚蠢是聪明人的座右铭,心酸是胜利者的通行证。 Paul giblin在新闻领域工作了24年,没有收×红×*包,没有讹诈×煤8老板,也没有调查捉*迷*藏。也许有人会说,幸运就像一坨狗屎,当你踩上它,想擦都擦不掉。(Paul Giblin官方网站http://www.paulgiblin.net/Home_Page.php 很明显,这个网站是他找工作用的。) 让我们看看这位记者在被裁掉的那一天,给这份报纸和其他记者的留言。
Paul Giblin: I’m checking outJanuary 2nd, 2009, 3:32 pm by Paul Giblin
Today, Jan. 2, 2009, is my final day at the Tribune.
I came aboard on Jan. 16, 1995, to cover news about the potential of a Major League Baseball team coming to the Valley. I spent years chasing stadiums, because about the time the Arizona Diamondbacks finally got started, there were rumblings that the Arizona Cardinals wanted a new stadium. In all, the Cardinals and various community leaders floated five different serious plans before University of Phoenix Stadium got built.
Also during those years, I’ve covered presidents, murderers, FBI agents, crooked law-enforcement officers, wildly successful entrepreneurs, homeless people, wildland firefighters, hurricane victims, sports stars, protestors, a guy with a mysterious hole in his front yard, and thousands of other people with interesting stories to tell.
I’ve gotten full expose here at the Tribune, working as a reporter, editor, columnist and blogger. It’s been a great ride and I’ve been fortunate to work alongside so many talented people dedicated to the lofty – and at times, seemingly ridiculous – ideals that are so deeply embedded in journalism.
So in parting, I’d like to offer my sincere thanks to all the people who have endured my questions, passed along tips, and worked with me since 1995.
Good bye. Good luck. I’ll see you where news happens. 但是幸运总是喜欢坚守的人。在Paul被裁掉之后,他和其他几个被裁掉的记者开办了The Arizona Guardian,一个新闻网站。 而在底特律的the Detroit Free Press,虽然凭借让市长下台的性丑闻报道获得了普利策奖,这家历史悠久的报纸仍然在读者流失和广告惨淡的重压下苦苦挣扎。

值得一提的是,本届普利策奖首次将14个新闻类奖项也同时面向互联网新闻媒体开放。自2006年以来,来自于附属于报纸实体媒体网站的网络内容就被 允许参加普利策新闻类别奖项的角逐,但是单纯的网络媒体则不得提交参赛作品。纯网络在线媒体只给与了两个类别的参与权:突发性新闻报道和突发新闻摄影。尽 管提供了机会,但是并没有任何纯网络在线新闻网站获得最后的大奖。
 普利策奖管理方表示,附属于平面杂志和广播的网站没有资格参加角逐。
 皮尤研究中心优秀新闻项目副主任艾米-米切尔表示,允许网络媒体加入竞争是对在线媒体在新闻方面扮演着日益重要角色的肯定。“这次参赛的大多数媒体都来自传统媒体,但是也有不少来自于非传统媒体,现在我们已经越来越清楚的看到,很多读者和观众都开始向网络迁移。”
  米切尔还表示,之前研究中心开展的一项调查中显示,一些人会担忧在线新闻报道可能会改变新闻业的基本价值观。一些受访者认为,在线新闻可能会让新闻业变得“只注重速度,而忽视准确性。”但同时,网络新闻又具有传统新闻无法代替的优势,比如“不但相关图片、视频、新闻可以点击链接,而且读者可以直接与记者、编辑和其他网友进行在线的互动交流。”
  来自印第安纳州迪保尔大学新闻教授罗伯特.M斯蒂尔表示:不管采用什么方式来报道新闻,保证新闻的准确性和公正性这一核心价值是须得到遵守的。不过他 也指出,2009年的普利策奖对在线媒体敞开大门,对当今数字媒体传播时代性来说意义非凡。他表示:“从某些方面来说,这促进了针对新形式新闻报道方式的 规范化进程,同时也带动了对于基本新闻信息报道和实质性新闻之间区别的进一步探讨。因为,仅仅是有人把知道的事情发布在了网上,这还算不上是新闻。”
  Slate网站的编辑大卫-普罗兹表示,尽管他认为自己的网站在政治、技术和商业方面都有很多杰出的作品,但是并没有参加这次普利策奖的角逐。“我们 不是一个传统新闻网站,我们所做的各种故事和项目与历来被授予普利策奖的作品完全不同。”但普罗兹表示,对于网络新闻媒体的承认比授予奖项更加重要。“这 是一次迟来的认可,因为有很多最优秀的新闻报道都通过网络来生动呈现的。这些新闻和平媒出版的新闻一样重要,而且在网络上,它更能带动人们对此新闻进行进 一步的探讨,这对于读者所产生的影响绝不逊色于任何伟大的获奖媒体。” 附录: 2009年普利策奖新闻类获奖名单:
  公共报道奖——拉斯维加斯《太阳报》
  卡通漫画奖——圣迭戈《联合论坛报》编辑Steve Breen
  评论类别奖——《华盛顿邮报》专栏作家Eugene Robinson
  解释性报告——《洛杉矶时报》的Bettina Boxall、Julie Cart
  当地新闻报道——底特律《自由出版社》工作人员;东峡谷《Tribune》的Jim Schaefer、M.L. Elrick、Ryan Gabrielson、Paul Giblin
  国家新闻报道——《圣彼得堡时报》
  专题写作——《圣彼得堡时报》Lane DeGregory
  编辑写作——《Post-Star》Mark Mahoney
  突发新闻摄影——迈阿密《先驱报》Patrick Farrell
  小说类别——Elizabeth Strout《奥利芙?吉特里奇》
  非小说类——Douglas A. Blackmon《奴隶制的另一个名称:美国黑人从内战到二战的二次奴役》
  传记类——Jon Meacham《美洲狮:安德鲁-杰克逊在白宫》
  戏剧类——Lynn Nottage《废墟》
  历史作品——Annette Gordon-Reed《蒙蒂塞洛赫明:一个美国家庭》
  诗歌——W.S. Merwin《天狼星阴影》
  音乐——Steve Reich《双六重唱》

The 2009 Pulitzer Prize winners and finalists:
JOURNALISM:
Public Service: The Las Vegas Sun, notably Alexandra Berzon, for exposing the high death rate among construction workers on the Las Vegas Strip. Finalists: The New York Times for coverage of the economic meltdown of 2008; the St. Petersburg Times for PolitiFact, its fact-checking initiative during the 2008 presidential campaign.
Breaking News Reporting: The New York Times for its coverage of a sex scandal that resulted in the resignation of Gov. Eliot Spitzer. Finalists: The Houston Chronicle for its coverage of Hurricane Ike; the St. Louis Post-Dispatch for its coverage of a city hall shooting that killed six people.
Investigative Reporting: David Barstow of The New York Times for reporting on how some retired generals had been co-opted by the Pentagon to make its case for war as radio and television analysts. Finalists: Paul Pringle of the Los Angeles Times for exposing financial abuses by the head of California's largest union; Susanne Rust and Meg Kissinger of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel for stories that stirred federal action on dangerous chemicals in everyday products.
Explanatory Reporting: Bettina Boxall and Julie Cart of the Los Angeles Times for exploring attempts to combat Western wildfires. Finalists: Adam Liptak of The New York Times for exposing differences in the U.S. judicial system from other those of other countries; Robert O'Harrow Jr. and Brady Dennis of The Washington Post for explaining why AIG nearly collapsed.
Local Reporting: The Detroit Free Press, notably Jim Schaefer and M.L. Elrick; and Ryan Gabrielson and Paul Giblin of the East Valley Tribune in Mesa, Ariz. The Free Press was cited for uncovering lies by Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick that included denial of a sexual relationship with an aide that eventually led to jail terms for the two officials. The Tribune won for revealing how a popular sheriff's focus on immigration enforcement endangered investigation of violent crime and other aspects of public safety. Finalists: Brendan McCarthy, Michael DeMocker and Ryan Smith of The (New Orleans) Times-Picayune for coverage of a murder case.
National Reporting: St. Petersburg Times for PolitiFact, a fact-checking initiative during the 2008 presidential campaign. Finalists: Amy Goldstein and Dana Priest of The Washington Post for covering abuses at immigration detention centers; John Shiffman, John Sullivan and Tom Avril of The Philadelphia Inquirer for environmental reporting; The Wall Street Journal for covering problems with the U.S. financial system.
International Reporting: The New York Times for coverage of U.S. military challenges in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Finalists: Rukmini Callimachi of The Associated Press for investigating the plight of impoverished children in Africa; The Washington Post for coverage of female oppression in the developing world.
Feature Writing: Lane DeGregory of the St. Petersburg Times for coverage of a neglected girl and her adoption. Finalists: John Barry of the St. Petersburg Times for coverage of a crippled dolphin; Amy Ellis Nutt of The (Newark, N.J.) Star-Ledger, for coverage of a stroke victim who then became an artist; and Diane Suchetka of The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer for coverage of a mechanic whose arms were reattached after an accident.
Commentary: Eugene Robinson of The Washington Post for columns on the 2008 presidential campaign. Finalists: Regina Brett of The Plain Dealer for insightful columns; Paul Krugman of The New York Times for columns on the financial crisis.
Criticism: Holland Cotter of The New York Times for art reviews. Finalists: Inga Saffron of The Philadelphia Inquirer for architecture reviews; Sebastian Smee of The Boston Globe for art reviews.
Editorial Writing: Mark Mahoney of The Post-Star, Glens Falls, N.Y., for editorials on local government secrecy. Finalists: Charles Lane of The Washington Post for editorials on the financial crisis; John McCormick, Marie Dillon and Bruce Dold of the Chicago Tribune for writing about government corruption.
Editorial Cartooning: Steve Breen of The San Diego Union-Tribune for a style that engages readers. Finalists: Mike Thompson of the Detroit Free Press for blending tradition with online possibilities; Matt Wuerker of Politico for mixing art and ideas.
Breaking News Photography: Patrick Farrell of The Miami Herald for photos of the aftermath of disastrous storms. Finalists: The Associated Press for photos of the aftermath of a Chinese earthquake; Carolyn Cole of the Los Angeles Times for photos of political violence in Kenya.
Feature Photography: Damon Winter of The New York Times for photos of Barack Obamas presidential campaign. Finalists: Carol Guzy of The Washington Post for coverage of maternal mortality in Sierra Leone; Sonya Hebert of The Dallas Morning News for photos of terminally ill patients.
___
ARTS:
Fiction: "Olive Kitteridge" by Elizabeth Strout (Random House). Finalists: "The Plague of Doves" by Louise Erdrich (HarperCollins); "All Souls" by Christine Schutt (Harcourt).
Drama: "Ruined" by Lynn Nottage. Finalists: "Becky Shaw" by Gina Gionfriddo; "In The Heights," by Lin-Manuel Miranda and Quiara Alegria Hudes.
History: "The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family" by Annette Gordon-Reed (W.W. Norton & Co.). Finalists: "This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War" by Drew Gilpin Faust (Alfred A. Knopf); "The Liberal Hour: Washington and the Politics of Change in the 1960s" by G. Calvin Mackenzie and Robert Weisbrot (The Penguin Press).
Biography: "American Lion: Andrew Jackson in the White House" by Jon Meacham (Random House). Finalists: "Traitor to His Class: The Privileged Life and Radical Presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt" by H.W. Brands (Doubleday); "The Bin Ladens: An Arabian Family in the American Century" by Steve Coll (The Penguin Press).
Poetry: "The Shadow of Sirius" by W.S. Merwin (Copper Canyon Press). Finalists: "Watching the Spring Festival" by Frank Bidart (Farrar, Straus and Giroux); "What Love Comes To: New & Selected Poems" by Ruth Stone (Copper Canyon Press).
General Nonfiction: "Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II" by Douglas A. Blackmon (Doubleday). Finalists: "Gandhi and Churchill: The Epic Rivalry That Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age" by Arthur Herman (Bantam Books); "The Bitter Road to Freedom: A New History of the Liberation of Europe" by William I. Hitchcock (Free Press).
___
MUSIC:
"Double Sextet" by Steve Reich (Boosey & Hawkes). Finalists: "7 Etudes for Solo Piano" by Don Byron (nottuskegeelike music/BMI); "Brion" by Harold Meltzer (Urban Scrawl Music Co.).
Quotes:
Comments from some Pulitzer Prize winners:
___
"It's a real shot in the arm in a year like this when, you know, some newspapers are closing and a lot of the others are on the ropes. And all of us are feeling some budget pressure. And it's a reminder of the things that newspapers can do that would be very hard to replace if we all went out of business." — Bill Keller, executive editor of The New York Times, which won Pulitzers for breaking news, investigative reporting, international reporting, criticism and feature photography.
____
"This Pulitzer Prize is reflective of the grit and determination in Detroit. It's a Free Press award based first on the reporting of two wonderful, supremely skilled, accurate, relentless reporters." — Paul Anger, Detroit Free Press vice president and editor. The paper and reporters Jim Schaefer and M.L. Elrick won the local reporting prize for uncovering lies by Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick that included his denial of a sexual relationship with an aide. Both officials eventually served time in jail.
___
"It is kind of sad. I wish I was still at the Tribune. I'd have a party with them right now." — laid-off journalist Paul Giblin, of the East Valley Tribune in Mesa, Ariz., who along with Ryan Gabrielson won for local reporting for a series showing how a sheriff's focus on immigration enforcement endangered investigation of other crimes.
Added publisher and CEO Julie Moreno: "You don't have to be a huge paper in order to do the kind of work that gets outstanding recognition."
___
"To have our work honored and recognized in a time when it just seems like all you're reading these days is that there may not be as much interest as there once was, it's just a real shot in the arm." — Neil Brown, executive editor of the St. Petersburg Times, which won the national reporting award for PolitiFact, a fact-checking initiative during the 2008 presidential campaign, and the feature writing award for coverage by Lane DeGregory of a neglected girl and her adoption.
___
"If I'm going to win, I'm glad it's for that. I think this indicates that we really are making a difference." — Mark Mahoney, who won the prize for editorials in The Post-Star of Glens Falls, N.Y., on the perils of secrecy in local government.
___
"Hooray for the L.A. Times. It was great that we were given the amount of time to report something that is so important to our readers." — Julie Cart, reporter for the Los Angeles Times, who along with Bettina Boxall won the prize for explanatory reporting for coverage of Western wildfires.
___
"I thought that it was an incredible piece of history that was unfolding in this country ... and I had to do my best to tell it." — Eugene Robinson, of The Washington Post, who won the prize for commentary for his columns on the 2008 presidential campaign.
___
"Winning the Pulitzer is fabulous, but the fact that this series stopped people from dying on Las Vegas Strip construction projects is the most important part of what we did." — Michael J. Kelley, managing editor of the Las Vegas Sun, which won the public service prize for exposing a high death rate among construction workers on the Strip. The work of reporter Alexandra Berzon was singled out for praise, which Kelley said "couldn't be more deserved."
___
"That's a country that everywhere you turn there's just an image that just needs to be seen ...." — Patrick Farrell, of The Miami Herald, who won in the breaking news photography category for his images of despair in Haiti after Hurricane Ike and other storms.
___
"It's a huge honor for me, but more importantly, I hope it really validates the idea that this is a part of American history that we have ignored and neglected, and it's time for a really dramatic reinterpretation of what happened to African-Americans during that period of time." — Douglas A. Blackmon, Atlanta bureau chief for The Wall Street Journal, who won in general nonfiction for "Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II."
___
"While they certainly gave it to composers, like, eventually, Charles Ives, Aaron Copland, John Adams ... there were a lot of very important people that they passed over who were not university types, and I'm not a university type. There's a bend in the road that happened, and that undoubtedly was part of my being selected." — Steve Reich, whose "Double Sextet" won the music prize.
____
"I wanted to tell the story of these women and the war in the Congo and I couldn't find anything about them in the newspapers or in the library, so I felt I had to get on a plane and go to Africa and find the story myself. I felt there was a complete absence in the media of their narrative. It's very different now, but when I went in 2004 that was definitely the case." — Lynn Nottage, who won for "Ruined," a drama set in Congo.

  

2008年5月7日星期三

The 9th observer: Chinese bloggers calls for a boycott for Kappa

这是商店里的实体货。450){this.resize=true;this.width = 450;}">
这是商店里的实体货。
有网友在KAPPA的官网里找到了这个衣服的截图,居然是真的!450){this.resize=true;this.width = 450;}">
有网友在KAPPA的官网里找到了这个衣服的截图,居然是真的!
有网友在KAPPA的官网里找到了这个衣服的截图,居然是真的!450){this.resize=true;this.width = 450;}">
有网友在KAPPA的官网里找到了这个衣服的截图,居然是真的!
证据确凿!kappa支持藏独,让kappa滚出中国(多图)450){this.resize=true;this.width = 450;}">